Principles

E&Y MVM study | WW - alternative GAAP issues | E&Y impact of FV on P/C | WW - alternative life GAAP


News Release

  • CONTACT: Doug Barnert
    1-212-480-0808
    doug@gnaie.net


    WATSON WYATT RELEASES ALTERNATIVE ACCOUNTING METHODOLOGY FOR LIFE INSURANCE STUDY

    February 7, 2005 (New York) Group of North American Insurance Enterprises (GNAIE) Chair Howard I. Smith today announced the public availability of a Watson Wyatt report Development of Alternative Accounting Methodology for Life Insurance and Similar Products. GNAIE commissioned the report to study a general accounting methodology that could be used by life insurance standard setters around the world.

    “ GNAIE’s goal in publishing this report is to encourage international discussion on these and other potential models. GNAIE is not presently endorsing any particular accounting model. The report will be a valuable resource document for developing accounting standards that will enhance the value of financial statements to investors and other users,” said Smith, who is AIG Vice Chairman and CFO.

    GNAIE members include companies who are the largest global providers of insurance and substantial multi-national corporations. All are major participants in the US market. The goal of GNAIE is to influence international accounting standards to ensure that they result in high quality accounting standards for insurance companies and, to that end, to increase communication between insurers doing business in North American and the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and the United States Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). GNAIE works to meet it goals through modeling of proposed accounting standards, analysis, comment, and coordination with various end users of financial reports.

    The goal of the methodology was to retain features of existing accounting standards which facilitate the measurement of the value of the company while introducing new features which would facilitate comparison between savings and protection products, according to the report’s summary. The methodology developed by Watson Wyatt, entitled “Alternative GAAP,” uses a Net Reserve calculation, which is similar to a gross premium valuation.

    The report concludes:

    • Alternative GAAP provides a consistent measure across all product lines for the purpose of valuing liabilities and creating a basis for reasonable comparisons.
    • The methodology is consistent with the objectives of preventing unnecessary fluctuations in earnings.
    • As with any new financial reporting structure, industry practices and accounting and actuarial guidelines need to be developed in order to enhance the effectiveness of the results.
    • Investments that support long duration insurance contracts may require special standards for measurement and recognition.

    The report also identifies a variety of issues that required additional research including:

    • When and how assumptions should be unlocked.
    • How risk margins should be set.
    • What disclosures should be presented alongside the primary accounting information
    • The effects of a deposit floor
    • The treatment of guarantees to reflect policyholder behavior

    GNAIE will be working with Watson Wyatt to address these issues in upcoming months.
    Watson Wyatt’s study compares US statutory accounting, US GAAP, and Alternative GAAP for five product lines that are common in the US: 20 year level term, long term care, variable annuity, universal life, and participating whole life.

    “The International Accounting Standards Board has committed to a clean slate for its second phase of the Insurance Contracts Project. At the meetings of the Insurance Working Group, an advisory body to the IASB, the insurance industry has offered its resources to assist the IASB in the development of robust standards. We believe this report will assist in that process.” Smith said.

    “GNAIE has published this report in hopes of stimulating discussion on this comprehensive model. We believe the development of standards should be based upon a holistic modeling approach rather than upon piecemeal decisions on individual issues. We invite comments from standard setters, regulators, analysts, and the insurance industry on the concepts presented in the report,” Smith added.

    -- Continue Here --